On the eve of the vote on tax reform, defenders and critics speak out

The Front’s advisory says that the PEC doesn’t suggest options to the service sector, as exists for different sectors

On the eve of the date set for the vote on the tax reform in the Constitution and Justice Committee (CCJ) of the Senate, defenders and critics launched manifestos on the proposal in reverse instructions.

The manifesto “In favor of a Comprehensive Reform of Consumption Taxation” introduced collectively 14 economists from totally different traces of financial and political thought to defend the approval of Proposed Constitutional Amendment (PEC) 110 by senators: Affonso Celso Pastore, Ana Carla Abrão, Armínio Fraga , Bernard Appy, Edmar Lisboa Bacha, Elena Landau, Gustavo Loyola, José Roberto Mendonça de Barros, Maílson da Nóbrega, Marcos Mendes, Nelson Barbosa, Pérsio Arida and Sérgio Gobetti.

In the textual content, the group states {that a} complete reform of consumption taxation is important, changing ICMS, ISS, IPI and contributions to PIS and Cofins with one or two worth added taxes (VAT), primarily based on broad, laws as homogeneous as potential and, ideally, a single fee, along with a selective tax of a regulatory nature.

READ ALSO  Twitter bloqueia perfil de Eduardo Bolsonaro, admite erro e libera conta

“We are assured {that a} tax reform with these traits could have a really optimistic impact on the nation’s productiveness and progress potential, along with contributing to the discount of social and regional inequalities”, says the manifesto.

They had been radically against “magic” and disastrous options for the financial system, reminiscent of changing present taxes with a tax on monetary transactions, generally known as the CPMF.

In one other manifesto, “Tax Reform – The answer of one, is the drawback of all”, the Joint Parliamentary Services Front took a place towards the PEC, arguing that it doesn’t take note of the variations that make up the service sector and different sectors. .

The Front’s advisory says that the PEC doesn’t suggest options to the service sector, as exists for different sectors, reminiscent of the technology of ICMS credit that trade and commerce obtain, when buying their inputs.


“Only via a extremely simplified system will we’ve got aggressive circumstances to leverage the Brazilian financial system to develop into an successfully developed nation in a global atmosphere and enable our corporations to develop and develop in a secure and promising atmosphere”, says the manifesto, which avoids face the idea of ​​the want for reform.

READ ALSO  Pained over 'regionalism', Prakash Raj quits MAA after losing vote

Estadão Content

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this: